Türk Medline
ADR Yönetimi
ADR Yönetimi

6-MINUTE PEGBOARD AND RING TEST IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE: AN ASSESSMENT OF VALIDITY, RELIABILITY AND MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE

Aylin TANRIVERDİ EYOLCU, Serap ACAR, İsmail ÖZSOY, Buse ÖZCAN KAHRAMAN, Mehmet Birhan YILMAZ, Ebru ÖZPELİT, Bahri AKDENİZ, Sema SAVCI

Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences - 2026;10(1):130-139

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Türkiye

 

Purpose: Our study aimed to assess the validity, reliability, and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) in patients with heart failure (pwHF). Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 37 pwHF. Upper extremity functional capacity was evaluated using the 6PBRT. The 6PBRT was executed twice to investigate within-session reliability. The upper extremity muscle strength was measured using a dynamometer. Functional capacity, activities of daily living, and quality of life were assessed with the Milliken Activities of Daily Living Scale (MAS), six-minute walk test (6MWT) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), respectively. Results: Reliability was excellent for 6PBRT, with an ICC of 0.957 (95% CI, 0.863 to 0.982). The MDC of the 6PBRT was 23.75 rings. The 6PBRT was strongly correlated with functional class (rho=-0.778, p<0.001), MAS (r=0.670, p<0.001) and 6MWT distance (r=0.626, p<0.001), and moderately correlated with age (r=-0.513, p=0.001), shoulder abductor (dominant r=0.580, p<0.001), shoulder flexor (dominant r=0.543, p=0.001), elbow extensor (dominant r=0.428, p=0.008), elbow flexor muscle strength (dominant rho=0.469, p=0.003), and MLHFQ (rho=-0.442, p=0.006). Conclusion: The 6PBRT provides a valid and reliable assessment of upper extremity functional capacity in pwHF. Executing 6PBRT at least twice is recommended to avoid the learning effect.