Türk Medline
ADR Yönetimi
ADR Yönetimi

CLINICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CURVE LOCATION AND BODY IMAGE, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND DEPRESSION LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATIC SCOLIOSIS

Busra Nur Ozcan Erisgin, Bedirhan Albayrak, Altan Aksu, Ahmet Uzun, Huseyin Sina Coskun

Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery - 2026;37(2):76-81

Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun

 

Objective: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional spinal deformity that may negatively affect adolescents' psychosocial well-being. Increasing evidence suggests that radiographic severity alone does not fully explain the impact of scoliosis on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, the extent to which curve magnitude and location influence domain-specific HRQoL outcomes remains unclear. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 65 adolescents with AIS who were evaluated at a university hospital outpatient clinic. Participants completed the validated Turkish version of the scoliosis research society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Standing posteroanterior full-spine radiographs were used to determine Cobb angle, curve location (proximal thoracic, main thoracic, thoracolumbar/lumbar), and Risser stage. Differences among SRS-22 domains were assessed using the Friedman test, followed by Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Comparisons between curve location groups were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Associations between curve magnitude and SRS-22 domain scores were assessed using Spearman correlation. Results: Self-image and mental health were the most adversely affected SRS-22 domains, whereas pain and functional activity scores were relatively preserved [Friedman chi2(4)=78.18, p<0.001]. No significant differences in SRS-22 total or domain scores were observed across curve location groups (all p>0.05). Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated no significant associations between Cobb angle magnitude and any SRS-22 domain. Conclusion: Psychosocial domains, particularly self-image and mental health, constitute the primary burden in AIS and appear largely independent of radiographic severity and the curve pattern. These findings support a patient-centered approach to AIS management that incorporates psychosocial assessment alongside conventional radiographic evaluation.