YEŞİM ŞERİFE BAYRAKTAR, YASEMİN CEBECİ, BÜŞRA PEKİNCE, DİLARA CARİ GÜNGÖR, MUSLU KAZIM KÖREZ, FARUK ÇİÇEKCİ, JALE BENGİ ÇELİK
Genel Tıp Dergisi - 2024;34(6):861-866
Abstract Background/Aims: This study aims to compare the reliability of the FOUR (Full Outline of Unresponsiveness) score and GCS (Glasgow Coma Score) when used by specialists from different medical disciplines. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine between December 2023 and June 2024. Eighty-two patients in the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were assessed by three specialistsa pulmonologist, a neurologist, and an anesthesiologistwithin 24 hours of ICU admission. The variation between evaluators of both scoring systems was analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). If the ICC coefficient was below 0.50, the agreement was interpreted as poor. Results: The study included 82 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the FOUR and GCS scores assigned by the three specialists. The mortality rate among patients with low scores on both FOUR and GCS was higher than the hospital mortality rate. Conclusions: Scales used in the ICU should be simple, reliable and predictive. This study demonstrated that the FOUR score is at minimum equivalent to the GCS in meeting these criteria.
